5 ms·
I'd be interested to know if this is integrated and rebranded nanobox [0]? Or something completely from scratch? [0]: https://nanobox.io/ https://nanobox.io/
by bizzleDawg 6y ago
I'd be interested to know if this is integrated and rebranded nanobox [0]? Or something completely from scratch?
[0]: https://nanobox.io/ https://nanobox.io/
- phildougherty 6y agoWe certainly took a lot of inspiration and leaned on the awesome experience of the nanobox team, but this is largely a completely different architecture.
- sciurus 6y agoCan you tell us anything about the architecture?
- phildougherty 6y agoWe will be revealing a lot more about the architecture at our upcoming virtual conference called Deploy that is happening Nov 10-11th. There are a few sessions that touch on how the platform was implemented and I encourage you to tune in for those! (schedule to be announced soon). https://www.digitalocean.com/deploy/ https://www.digitalocean.com/deploy/
- alexellisuk 6y agoThis is what I found out by printing the environment variables: https://twitter.com/alexellisuk/status/1306343018488791040 https://twitter.com/alexellisuk/status/1306343018488791040
- Existenceblinks 6y agoWasn't the Appsail nanobox? IIRC, it was planed to be DO's PaaS, so it's cancelled and then DO's PaaS is based on k8s instead?
- dubcanada 6y agoAppsail was nanobox from what I saw, they redid it between appsail and "apps".
- Existenceblinks 6y agoIf Appsail was cancelled, what's the point of nanobox acquiring .. I wonder?
- dubcanada 6y agoMaybe an acquihire? I don't recall seeing any of the nanobox people even mentioned or reply in any of the slack messages. So I am not really sure.
- 101008 6y agoI am out of the loop, but at a quick loo it seems nanobox provided a way to deploy apps on top of Digital Ocean. Since you said "integrated and rebranded", does that mean DO bought nanobox? Or they just "copied" it*?
- anuragsoni 6y agoNanobox was acquired by Digitalocean. More details at https://www.digitalocean.com/blog/digitalocean-acquires-nanobox/ https://www.digitalocean.com/blog/digitalocean-acquires-nano...
- dubcanada 6y agoIt's completely from scratch, and based on playing around with it, it's a weird kubernates system. Which is why the pricing seems super weird compared to existing DO products (100GB's base and then you pay per a GB). Nanobox was a tool that allows you to build and manage a container with setups for heroku build packs. It handled deployment, load balancing, etc. Similar to heroku for example. But it also worked with Vultr, Amazon, etc.
- JamiePrentice 6y agoI was hoping to see more about what happened to Nanobox after Digital Ocean aquired them. I thought what they had was really well done and was excited to see where they took it.
- bizzleDawg 6y agoYeah, I've been keeping an eye on their site which seems to indicate they were going to release something. I guess that's not happening any more!
- aitchnyu 6y agoI was guessing KNative, which powers Google Cloud Run. https://knative.dev/ https://knative.dev/
- alexellisuk 6y agoGoogle's Cloud Run the SaaS doesn't use KNative + K8s under the hood. It just uses a compatible HTTP API.
- coryrc 6y agoThat's correct, though "Cloud Run for Anthos" is KNative + k8s + secret sauce though (I work on it). Google has reached Microsoft-level naming complexity... - https://cloud.google.com/anthos/run/ https://cloud.google.com/anthos/run/
- tpetry 6y agoIt‘s so sad nanobox was acquired and now trashed by digital ocean. It was comparable to a dokku/flynn on steroids, it was a very promising stack for self-hosted herokus.