4 ms·

Thanks! I'm not completely sure yet, and haven't given it much thought. But I suppose there will be a limit on the number of communities/publications one can o

Thanks! I'm not completely sure yet, and haven't given it much thought. But I suppose there will be a limit on the number of communities/publications one can own. There definitely ought to be a mechanism to cut down on power user abuse. I'm happy to hear thoughts/ideas/advice on this!

JoshTriplett 6y ago
You're also going to have to deal with cases where the creator of a sub-community fails to do their job as a moderator (or actively works against it). In the limiting case, if you get a DMCA takedown notice, get a GDPR notice, get a C&D, discover illicit materials of other types, discover that people are using your site to plan crimes/attacks/etc, or any number of other things, you're still responsible for that.
- SubGenius 6y ago
  Ah yes, those are things I need to think about eventually. Thanks for the advice.
  - marcuswebb 6y ago
    It's worth noting that emergent communities like this devolve into fascism pretty quickly (as more forums, reddit, & fb groups have proven) so you might want to think about this / bring in someone who is an expert on community management.
    - SubGenius 6y ago
      You're right, it's not something I want to put off till it's too late. Thanks for the advice!
      - JoshTriplett 6y ago
        Definitely look carefully at the absolute worst that can be found on the Internet, and the worst that sites with user-submitted content have to deal with, and decide in advance what you do and don't want to support. Anything you don't want to say "yeah, I'd be completely fine hosting that without hesitation" about, you should think about now, and put in corresponding policies now. Having policies in advance means people will just go elsewhere. Trying to add such policies later, when you have existing users, will be much harder. You're likely to want to draw that line somewhere; better to draw it in advance. (I've dealt with user-generated content before; please feel free to reach out privately if you'd like to talk about it further.)

JoshTriplett 6y ago

You're also going to have to deal with cases where the creator of a sub-community fails to do their job as a moderator (or actively works against it). In the limiting case, if you get a DMCA takedown notice, get a GDPR notice, get a C&D, discover illicit materials of other types, discover that people are using your site to plan crimes/attacks/etc, or any number of other things, you're still responsible for that.

SubGenius 6y ago
Ah yes, those are things I need to think about eventually. Thanks for the advice.
- marcuswebb 6y ago
  It's worth noting that emergent communities like this devolve into fascism pretty quickly (as more forums, reddit, & fb groups have proven) so you might want to think about this / bring in someone who is an expert on community management.
  - SubGenius 6y ago
    You're right, it's not something I want to put off till it's too late. Thanks for the advice!
    - JoshTriplett 6y ago
      Definitely look carefully at the absolute worst that can be found on the Internet, and the worst that sites with user-submitted content have to deal with, and decide in advance what you do and don't want to support. Anything you don't want to say "yeah, I'd be completely fine hosting that without hesitation" about, you should think about now, and put in corresponding policies now. Having policies in advance means people will just go elsewhere. Trying to add such policies later, when you have existing users, will be much harder. You're likely to want to draw that line somewhere; better to draw it in advance. (I've dealt with user-generated content before; please feel free to reach out privately if you'd like to talk about it further.)