4 ms·
> I tried copy-pasting an example here, but it didn't render. Is this any better?: ◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙╗◙◙╗ ◙◙╗◙◙╗ ◙◙╗◙◙◙╗ ◙◙╗ ╚══◙◙╔══╝◙◙║ ◙◙║◙◙║ ◙◙║◙◙◙◙╗ ◙
by a1369209993 6y ago
> I tried copy-pasting an example here, but it didn't render.
Is this any better?:
◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙╗◙◙╗ ◙◙╗◙◙╗ ◙◙╗◙◙◙╗ ◙◙╗
╚══◙◙╔══╝◙◙║ ◙◙║◙◙║ ◙◙║◙◙◙◙╗ ◙◙║
◙◙║ ◙◙◙◙◙◙◙║◙◙║ ◙◙║◙◙╔◙◙╗ ◙◙║
◙◙║ ◙◙╔══◙◙║◙◙║ ◙◙║◙◙║╚◙◙╗◙◙║
◙◙║ ◙◙║ ◙◙║╚◙◙◙◙◙◙╔╝◙◙║ ╚◙◙◙◙║
╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═╝ ╚═══╝
Edit: No, no it is not. (HN drops U+2588 '' for some reason.)
Edit: But U+25D9 '◙' works.
@mods: I assume no one has commit access to fix this bug, but on the off chance they do: bug report: HN deletes U+2588 character at some point in the path from submitting a comment to that comment being displayed; not sure exactly what part's going wrong there.