4 ms·
Last year, many of the houses that burned down in Malibu were miles from the nearest wildfires. It turns out that burning embers can travel miles in the right w
by gamblor956 6y ago
Last year, many of the houses that burned down in Malibu were miles from the nearest wildfires. It turns out that burning embers can travel miles in the right wind conditions.
And pasture land is the worst type of buffer, since dry grass burns easily, and quite hot. NorCal, for example, has lots of pasture land, especially in wine country, and that is one of the reasons that Santa Rosa and Napa have been hit with major fires every year for the past 3 years.
There are existing ways to protect a town from burning down, largely related to building designs and materials. The problem is that these all cost money, and the type of people that live in these high-risk mountain towns generally don't have the money to incorporate those features into their buildings.
- Retric 6y agoI suggest you actually look at some satellite footage of Santa Rosa, Napa, and Malibu. California has plenty of ranches, but their not acting as a buffer around those areas. Also, being within a few miles of forest is really close in wildfire terms. When people think of wildfire buffers they point to things like roads and firebreaks, but that’s only useful when people are actively fighting fires. You want tens of miles not feet between structures and wildfires.