4 ms·
These judge's don't have a real conflict of interest--as is traditionally understood. They don't make money from these suits--directly or indirectly.
by rhino369 6y ago
These judge's don't have a real conflict of interest--as is traditionally understood. They don't make money from these suits--directly or indirectly.
- dogma1138 6y agoIf they are elected I’m sure they’ll get plenty of donations next time they run tho.
- xbar 6y agoAppointed. Irrelevant.
- jjoonathan 6y ago> They don't make money from these suits--directly or indirectly. That's a suspiciously strong claim given the enormous number of options for laundering money/value indirectly. What makes you so sure his contribution to patent trolls' cause is completely unreciprocated?
- Rebelgecko 6y agoWhat contribution?
- jjoonathan 6y agoThe contribution that has patent trolls flocking to East Texas.
- bostik 6y agoThey are not supposed to, but this is the real world. Not the ideal one. I know at least one corruption scandal where judges (2) were getting paid to deliver verdicts in certain way.[0] That was so egregious that it broke the news. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal