4 ms·
It isn't a binary choice between politicians choosing judges, and elections for judges. Both these approaches have the effect of politicising the matter. In Eng
by MaxBarraclough 6y ago
It isn't a binary choice between politicians choosing judges, and elections for judges. Both these approaches have the effect of politicising the matter. In England, the legal system has its own (somewhat arcane) solution for appointing judges.
Personally I strongly favour this approach. Judges should not be overtly political, and the process for their appointment should be closer to the way we certify doctors than to the way we choose politicians.
The English system doesn't provide an ironclad guarantee against political meddling, but there's always a tradeoff there: we want both accountability and independence, and these are opposing. (Also, I'm English, for what that's worth.)
https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/the-judiciary-the-government-and-the-constitution/jud-acc-ind/jud-appts/ https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/the-judiciary-t...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_judge_(England_and_Wales)#Appointment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_judge_(England_and_...
- brundolf 6y agoThat sounds interesting. My main point was just that right now, a huge amount of judicial power is bundled under a single big presidential election, instead of being allowed to have more political granularity like Congress. Imagine if the president got to nominate congresspeople. Think about how broken that would be.