2 ms·
It's not necessarily a more expensive system, such systems are used for the bulk of bank transactions in many places. It's just that there are some minor disad
by PeterisP 6y ago
It's not necessarily a more expensive system, such systems are used for the bulk of bank transactions in many places.
It's just that there are some minor disadvantages (a bit of profitability back when higher interest rates meant that any delay brings interest revenue to the bank, but mostly customer habits - no single institution wants to be the one to try and change them) so USA banks won't make such a change unless forced to.
- mywittyname 6y agoAre wire transfers free in Europe? I've only used them a handful of times, but each time the cost was not insignificant, like $30 or so. A quick look around online suggests that price is consistent. This suggests to me that there's a intrinsic cost to supplying the guarantees that a person gets with a wire transfer over something like an ACH. And that's probably why ACH has the shortcomings that it does.
- r00fus 6y agoSEPA same day is free in a lot of countries from my experience setting up bank automation for various corporate clients. Not sure if it’s free for people though.
- smartbit 6y agoSEPA same minute for sure is free for private customers in some EU countries.
- PeterisP 6y agoFor EUR transfers within EU, the SEPA CT is the equivalent of a wire transfer and has pretty much replaced them. The fully loaded cost of processing such a transfer by a bank is in the ballpark of 0.01-0.02 EUR if I recall correctly, depending on the economies of scale they can get; so for private persons some banks/some markets offer them for free and some banks/markets charge something like 0.30 EUR, it depends on the level of competition for general services, how much they can earn on other services from that customer, etc. As for most services, the price is not really determined by costs but by the competition and plausible alternatives. There is some intrinsic cost for a 'true' wire transfer, but (1) it's not due to the benefits/guarantees that the customer gets, but due to legacy/compatibility issues requiring a not-that-scalable process, lack of international cooperation, and the inefficiencies of bilateral settlements (or, often, a chain of bilateral settlements) vs a centralized bulk settlement system; and (2) it's not in line with the prices charged. $30 for a wire transfer is a reasonable market price in many markets, but the fully loaded cost for a wire transfer (assuming a electronically initiated proper payment without any missing information so it gets 'straight-through processing') that I recall is something comparable to $2, the rest is profit - the market for this service is simply not competitive (people choose their banks based on other factors, not the level of rare fees like this) so that's a revenue stream that nobody wants to let go without a good reason.
- BrandoElFollito 6y agoIn all the banks I know in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Belgium and probably others I sent or got money from) , SEPA wire transfers are free. This is probably not a law, but driven by competivity.