3 ms·
I think the whole idea for the Nano was having a GPU on a small computer. The RPi doesn't have that. If you're comparing them as plain CPU-based development sys
by Florin_Andrei 6y ago
I think the whole idea for the Nano was having a GPU on a small computer. The RPi doesn't have that. If you're comparing them as plain CPU-based development systems, you're missing the whole point of the Nano.
- talkingtab 6y agoJust so there is no confusion, the Raspberry Pi 4 supports dual 4k displays out of the box. It has a built in Broadcom VideoCore VI @ 500 Mhz GPU and dual micro HDMI ports so you are good to go. Perhaps you meant a discrete GPU?
- erichocean 6y agoThe Nano supports CUDA; the Pi doesn't.
- Florin_Andrei 6y agoThis is not about the display. It's about running CUDA-accelerated machine learning stuff. Think - pytorch. That's the whole point of the Nano. If you're not doing that, use an RPi.