3 ms·
apparently part of the problem here was simply the fact that they used the columns [1] (of which there are far fewer, even on newer versions of excel) instead o
by weswpg 6y ago
apparently part of the problem here was simply the fact that they used the columns [1] (of which there are far fewer, even on newer versions of excel) instead of the rows
[1] https://twitter.com/standupmaths/status/1313055411285774336?s=20 https://twitter.com/standupmaths/status/1313055411285774336?...
edit: retracting this as the person who posted that tweet made a correction in one of the replies
- ryankrage77 6y agoabout 26^3 columns, or 17576