3 ms·

All that it implies is that previously they were not being transparent about the numbers and now they are finally being forthcoming.

• easytiger 6y ago
  > they were not being transparent about the numbers and now they are finally being forthcoming. and that's the case?
  • tux1968 6y ago
    Why are you asking questions to some random person on the internet? Do you know something you're not sharing? I was just trying to be helpful and relay an answer to your question that I gleaned from the article itself. I have no special access to any information.
    • easytiger 6y ago
      I was demonstrating the nature of the journalism which tries to implicitly install suspicion from the headline to forward an agenda