2 ms·
Their status page is annoying me more and more with these recent outages. Recalling the incidents in September, it's a bit cheeky they call that "99.93%" uptim
by sdflhasjd 6y ago
Their status page is annoying me more and more with these recent outages.
Recalling the incidents in September, it's a bit cheeky they call that "99.93%" uptime (30 mins of downtime).
Having remembered that there were at _least_ 2 seperate 1 hour+ incidents where I was struggling to send messages in Sept, I went through to look at the history, and they seem to have purposefully hidden these incidents on the calendar. There's no way of listing incidents in a month.
The information and accessibility of the status page is obviously politically motivated by marketing.
- supernova87a 6y agoIf companies were honest, they would multiply downtime by the number of users at the time. Because of course, great uptime doesn't matter if it's only uptime when no one is using it in the middle of the night. It's like when trains report 95% on time, except that the times when the service is delayed is when the trains are full. All the delays that actual people experience (person-hours) happen in that 5%.