I disagree with the author's point of view for the following reasons. #1 Anyone fancy using a medical device MVP? (shudders) #2 The author makes the point tha

I disagree with the author's point of view for the following reasons. #1 Anyone fancy using a medical device MVP? (shudders) #2 The author makes the point that a two-person team would be unable to finance the certification regulations and that would be a valid point except that trust me when I say that if your fledgling company had a fully working, well tested and well crafted/coded application and that all that you needed was some seed money to clear the regulatory hurdles then the VC cash would flow, especially these days. Which leads us on to the issue of documentation. As part of due diligence, good documentation will help clinch the deal. As a small crew the documentation part of it would almost write itself in a weeks worth of everyone contributing if done at the point of serious VC interest. So given that, I disagree with the author because any App, API, $thing is going to need a lot more QC than say Candy Crush and I’m happy for that to remain the case.