3 ms·
I stopped reading when they said it is only 1.7% efficient but expect it to get up to 12%. That's almost an order of magnitude! It seems unlikely that their p
by prewett 16y ago
I stopped reading when they said it is only 1.7% efficient but expect it to get up to 12%. That's almost an order of magnitude! It seems unlikely that their prototypes are so bad that they can get an order of magnitude improvement easily. And if it takes years of work to get to 12%, well, everybody else is claiming great performance in the nebulous future, too.
- melling 16y agoConsidering that you currently get 0%, that's not bad. If the cost is low enough and people could reduce they're electric bill by a small amount why not dual-purpose your windows? It might even pay for the upgrade over ten years.