2 ms·
I wasn't a fan. It was a bunch of disjointed essays rather than a real history. The later parts really deviated from the promise.
by wbl 6y ago
I wasn't a fan. It was a bunch of disjointed essays rather than a real history. The later parts really deviated from the promise.
- thechao 6y agoRight!? He discusses flatness, but not planarity, or levelness. Not even a glimmer of an attempt to describe the bootstrapping to precision. What’s weird is he starts talking about electronics when he gets to the 20th c., yet the 20th c. is perhaps the century where good old fashioned precision has improved the most! A complete dodge & waste of money.
- wombatmobile 6y agoSome reviewers said that. I didn't feel that way, or notice a lack of continuity, possibly because I enjoyed each chapter on its own merits. For example, I didn't know about ASML at all, even though I've been in the computer and software business fora. long time, so I was just fascinated to learn details about something I'd taken for granted, but which is clearly a peak achievement in the history of human precision manufacturing.