7 ms·

Science Fiction Stories with Good Astronomy and Physics: A Topical Index

219 points by firebaze 6y ago

coolgod 6y ago
The literature in high impact science journals also makes for great science fiction stories.
- b215826 6y ago
  Also the most boring ones.
- aaronblohowiak 6y ago
  can you explain a bit more ?
  - ringshall 6y ago
    Nature at least used to publish a single-page science fiction story at the back of every issue. They still publish online, though they've dropped it from the print edition. edit: https://www.nature.com/nature/articles?type=futures https://www.nature.com/nature/articles?type=futures
    - garmaine 6y ago
      While true, I think the grandparent post was making a snarky comment about peer review quality and the replication crisis.
neuromancer2701 6y ago
Alastair Reynolds is just amazing to me. As a side note, I absolutely love the intro The Expanse show because of the all the orbital mechanics.
- justinclift 6y ago
  > Alastair Reynolds is just amazing to me. His earlier stuff, definitely yes (eg The Inhibitor series). His more recent works (eg Revenger series) is pretty average if not outright bad. I'm on the third book of the Revenger series now, and it's just... crap. :( If you haven't read it yet, avoid it. Major foundation sections of the third books' plot are completely nonsensical, the characters do outright idiotic things to move the plot along, etc. It's not good reading. :(
  - jimmygrapes 6y ago
    I think the Revenger series is intended to be more Young Adult level stuff. The Revelation Space series has a lot of good stuff, but also takes pains to not overly explain every tech advance. Diamond Dogs is my all time favorite, even if it's absurd.
  - garmaine 6y ago
    Honestly that’s how I felt about Redemption Ark and Absolution Gap too. His writing got bad when he was just tying up loose ends towards the end. Loved Revelation Space, Chasm City, and all the short stories in that universe though. Diamond Dogs is one of my favorite novellas.
- 7thaccount 6y ago
  Revelation Space was amazing as were some of the short stories. I just wish they weren't all so pessemistic. I loved the demarchists and the conjoiners.
TeMPOraL 6y ago
That's a great list, thanks for posting! There's lots of stuff there I haven't read, but want to now. On the same topic, another good resource is the Atomic Rockets Seal of Approval: http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/sealofapproval.php http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/sealofapproval.... - an award given by the Atomic Rockets site for works of fiction that get the physics right.
kaliali 6y ago
How is Three-Body Problem not in here? Otherwise, good list to look at.
- teraflop 6y ago
  Whatever else you might say about The Three-Body Problem, its physics and astronomy are pretty implausible (the sequels drastically more so).
  - maire 6y ago
    I am surprised that Dark Forest is not on the list given they have a whole section on alien life. I now judge all first contact stories against Dark Forest. It does have Gateway on the list which had implausible black holes - so I don't think the plausibility bar is high.
    - mdoms 6y ago
      Yup I would have expected to see Dark Forest because it has such a plausible universe of life and its dynamics, and a believable solution to the Fermi Paradox.
- garmaine 6y ago
  Its physics and astronomy are laughably bad.
download13 6y ago
Basically anything by Greg Egan is great. His early short stories have a lot of "drugs can let your brain talk to other dimensions" and "your mind literally makes reality" (though some of those are also really good, "The Infinite Assassin" is a great read and it's only like 15 pages), but his later full books are basically all hard (if speculative) physics stuff. Dichronauts is difficult to get your head around, but very rewarding. It's about cartographers who work in a universe with essentially 2.5 dimensions of space and 1.5 dimensions of time. The Orthogonal trilogy is about a species living in a toroidal universe where all 4 dimensions are identical and interchangeable. The universes of Diaspora, Schild's Ladder, and Incandescence are set in a future when most intelligent life in the galaxy lives in a network of space-computers and interact with the outside world via robots and programmable matter. Oh and I almost forgot the Bobiverse series. Not by Egan, but still good. Some guy gets stuck in a brain-computer and sent off in a self-replicating space probe to prepare other planets for human colonization.
- jeremyjh 6y ago
  Agreed. My favorites are Diaspora, Distress and Permutation City. I like his short stories and I also liked Quarantine which got a mention in this list but its certainly not the only one with with really solid science in it.
- Nbox9 6y ago
  Bobiverse has lots of _good_ physics, especially around astromechanics, but also lots of questionable, bad, and unexplained physics. Specifically the FTL communications and the clone personality differences exist entirely for plot reasons, have very little explanation, and cause significant amounts of disbelief that must be suspended.
  - kbenson 6y ago
    Sure, but I find most interesting science fiction takes liberty at least somewhere. I'm willing to let the author play a little loosely with a few things, which are hopefully explained as "additional input we don't quite understand alter known theories" instead of "ignore this well accepted thing", if it adds significantly to the story. FTL communication? Eh, there's both enough new stuff to discover in physics and it provides such a massive boost to most stories that I'm generally willing to allow it, if treated well. The clone personalities diverging almost immediately? Kinda torn. On the one hand, I think they would diverge significantly eventually anyway (take anyone at age 40 and give them a couple hundred years of experience being a martial protector, trying to unite nations, an R&D head, or a explorer of the wondrous, and you're bound to come out the other side with large differences), so I'm not sure how important it was to have it immediately if the plot points it helped could have been achieved in some other manner.
nineplay 6y ago
From an excellent list, I'm going to hightlight a couple of lesser known works > Sheckley, Robert "Specialist" in Keyes, N., ed. Contact. 1963, Paperback Library. Proposes the idea that life in the universe is all specialized by function, except on Earth. Scheckley's short stories are uniformly excellent. > Clement, Hal Mission of Gravity. 1962, Pyramid. Life on a massive, rapidly rotating planet. Clement is a high-school science teacher. . (A new edition of all his stories about this planet was issued in 2002 by TOR, under the title Heavy Planet.) Fantastic book.
devindotcom 6y ago
Spin by Robert Charles Wilson comes to mind not necessarily because of truly realistic physics or astronomy, but that the physics of the situation are a sort of puzzle that come to make a lot of sense as things progress.
- sweetheart 6y ago
  This is still my all time favorite Sci Fi book. I just started the sequel last night, and I'm very excited to get sucked back into that world.
AnimalMuppet 6y ago
They got "Redshift Rendezvous"! Great! For those who haven't read it, spaceships create an environment where the speed of light is much slower - the write-up says 30 m/s; my memory is that it's more like 10 m/s, because people were able to sprint moderately close to the speed of light. In this world, you experience relativistic effects just walking around. It does a great job letting you experience what that would be like.
- Rebelgecko 6y ago
  There's a video game (maybe more of a tech demo?) called A Slower Speed of Light that is set in a universe where the speed of light is just a smidge faster than walking pace. It's fun seeing the redshift and lorentz transformation from a 1st person viewpoint
btilly 6y ago
They only mention Indistinguishable from Magic by Robert L Forward once. But it belongs in a bunch of these categories. Basically what it does is pick a variety of topics of interest to science fiction, has a science fact essay about it, then a short story with theoretically possible technology based on that topic. Highly recommended.
- stoneman24 6y ago
  Just finished “Camelot 30K” also by Robert L Forward. Humans meet aliens out in the Kuiper belt. Interesting ideas for alien life at very cold temperatures. Similar style to Dragon’s Egg (Mentioned in list) and equally enjoyable.
  - garmaine 6y ago
    Absolutely horrible characterization in Camelot 30K. I ended up skipping through the book and skimming past dialogue as it was so bad that it hurt to read. But the idea of the book was utterly fascinating, and I still think about it now and then, years after reading it. Definitely worth reading (or skimming) if you are the type that likes science fiction for the big ideas.
gorkish 6y ago
This list looks amazing. Anyone know of a similar curation for the quantum domain? I’d imagine the list to be ... smaller. /rimshot
philiplu 6y ago
I was expecting to see Arthur C. Clarke's "Fountains of Paradise" (where I first heard about space elevators), but it looks like this isn't aimed at technological ideas, more straight science. Though "telescopes" is one of the categories. Glad to see Poul Anderson's "Tau Zero" on the list - that made a big impression on me when I read it back in the 70s. Fun that Ted Chiang's "Exhalation" shows up in 3 different categories. Stunning story. I would have included his "Tower of Babylon" story as well - in cosmology <g>.
nobody9999 6y ago
Thanks to the poster for submitting this. I'm just now reading the last of the Culture Series[0] by Ian Banks (not included in the list, and for good reason) and will be looking for something new soon. I didn't see Nightfall[1] in the list (although I just skimmed, so it may be there), which (indirectly) addresses orbital dynamics in a system with multiple stars. Perhaps it should be included? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_series https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_series [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightfall_(Asimov_novelette_and_novel) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightfall_(Asimov_novelette_an...
- arethuza 6y ago
  I've been a Banks fan for a long long time - if you liked the Culture series you might like the Neal Asher Polity series. They aren't quite as well written as Banks - but they do make up for it with a lot of action and some superbly crafted scary beasties (Hooders being particularly terrifying).
  - nobody9999 6y ago
    Thanks for the recommendation!
hugocbp 6y ago
Not sure if it is on the same level of realism as those listed for evertyhign, but "The Expanse" series by James S. A. Corey for me was a breath of fresh air. The book really considers things like the time it would take to go from Earth to Mars, or the edge of the Solar System, and also take into account gravity forces in battles and other events. It still has a lot of very sci-fi things in some areas, but it was very interesting to see that going from Earth to somewhere after Neptune really took 8+ months for the passengers, including some of the psychological stress of spending that much time together on a small ship. The TV Series is also good but misses a lot of those little things that the books explicitly deal with. It became my favorite book series because of that. No magically going to another galaxy in the blink of an eye. Going to another planet always required planning, sacrifices, time, etc. In addition it also has some pretty nice politics compared to other space stories.
- avaldeso 6y ago
  > No magically going to another galaxy in the blink of an eye. Spoiler alert. They do though, kinda. Thousands of systems but all in the Milky Way.
  - hugocbp 6y ago
    I tried to keep all examples very, very general not to spoil anything. As a good sci-fi, the books will use some magic here and there, but it is very discrete, in my opinion. Not even close to what most popular space stories do for convenience. I gladly accept that part you are talking about since it came with a very good balance in other areas.
    - eslaught 6y ago
      In my opinion it's better to know that not strictly hard sci-fi. Let me explain, since I think this is an aspect of writing that's not widely appreciated. The beginning of a book essentially sets up "promises" for what the rest of the book is going to be like. In the case of Leviathan Wakes, I think it's entirely reasonable to see the book as making a promise that it's hard sci-fi, given that it's trying so hard to be. All of the little details, like you say, are made very obvious in the beginning. And then, you get a good ways into the book, and suddenly you realize that it's not really hard sci-fi after all. It can be a serious let-down since the book was leading you on to believe it was fully hard sci-fi. Now I'm not actually a huge fan of hard sci-fi per se, but this did irritate me that I didn't bother to pick up any of the sequels. Maybe I'll get back to it some day, since I do think some of the almost-hard details are nice, and now that I know to set the right expectations.
bovermyer 6y ago
David Weber's "Honorverse" series of novels - which starts with On Basilisk Station - has the most believable science fiction "false science" approach I've yet seen in fiction. There's a catch - you have to be OK with long-winded exposition - but the stories are really good, with a fascinating look at technology and culture of a not-too-distant future.
- techsupporter 6y ago
  > There's a catch - you have to be OK with long-winded exposition Saying Weber has long-winded exposition is a little like saying “Blade Runner” has the occasional sweeping visual. In his later Honorverse novels, especially the most recent, it really feels like our author is getting paid by the word. He has...a lot of story background he feels the need to fill in. If you’ve ever made it to the end of a “Star Trek: The Next Generation” episode and thought “wow, I wonder how that civilization came to be and what happened after our heroes left,” this is the series for you. They’re good stories and I like the middle of the arc in particular but, yes, I hope future readers like very detailed backgrounds on the technology or in-universe history of the societies in question.
mdoms 6y ago
I'd add Neal Stephenson's Seveneves to the Space Travel and perhaps comet sections. There was some excellent physics that dealt with issues like inertia, delta-V, orbital parameters, simulated gravity and complex dynamics (bolos etc) in great detail. As well, it handled long-term day to day life in space as a first class element of the book.
- the__alchemist 6y ago
  Agree - strongest book I've read in that category. Anathem for the QM section? Maybe a stretch!
  - duskwuff 6y ago
    If nothing else, I love the way that Anathem presents an alternate nomenclature for a whole range of scientific and philosophical concepts, ranging from the Hylian Theoric World (Platonic ideals) and Gardan's Steelyard (Occam's Razor) to Saunt Bucker's Basket (Faraday cage). While Stephenson's practice of inventing alternative names met with some derision (like https://xkcd.com/483/ https://xkcd.com/483/), it adds something to the work that wouldn't come through the same way with familiar names.
    - arethuza 6y ago
      "it adds something to the work that wouldn't come through the same way with familiar names" I think it would have been too close to Earth if there hadn't been some sense of "foreignness" created by the different words. Of course, the similarity of Arbre to Earth is an important part of the plot so its not like he could make the environment wildly different.
julienchastang 6y ago
"From the Earth to the Moon" by Jules Verne. The scientific description of how to launch a "rocket" (well, projectile really) and ultimately get stuck in lunar orbit (spoiler) is surprisingly accurate given its publishing date of 1865.
mmaunder 6y ago
This is amazing. Thanks firebaze for posting!!
duskwuff 6y ago
A surprising omission: Blindsight, Peter Watts (2006). A group of transhuman researchers make first contact with an unusual object of extraterrestrial origin. Light on exposition but hard on its science, with extensively researched (and annotated!) details ranging from astrophysics to biology and psychology. Available online: https://rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm https://rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm
m463 6y ago
I have to say... good physics and astronomy... does it lead to a good story? Is it just that some people can't "suspend their belief" without an explainable-in-present-day backdrop? Some of my most fun scifi stories are NOT explainable using current science. just off the top of my head "And He Built a Crooked House" by Heinlein "Little Black Bag" Kornbluth (both findable in one web search) the Gateway series by Pohl or basically anything with time travel or ftl. The thing is - the real world can be BORING. With present-day physics and astronomy - we are alone in the universe with real difficulty escaping our planet, let alone our solar system, galaxy or more. I think the answer to real-world physics and astronomy in science fiction is -- better character development :)
- narag 6y ago
  I just finished the very nice Anubis Gates by Tim Powers, that mixes time travel with magic.
  - JackFr 6y ago
    One of the most well-plotted time travel novels ever. The breadth of Powers’ creativity is a thing of wonder. There were ideas in that book which were just bits of throwaway color, which I still think about years after having read the book. That being said, his other books were a slight let down after Anubis Gates.
    - shadowprofile77 6y ago
      Major agreement with you there, and glad i'm not the only one. After reading the incredibly rich, beautifully rendered world of The Anubis Gates, I expected more of the same from his other books, but no, not quite as good, oddly. That book however remains the single best time travel fantasy novel I've ever read to this day. The blend of nearly phantasmagoric horror, fantasy and a touch of science fiction is unique too. If anyone knows of any similar novels from other authors, i'm all ears.
  - m463 6y ago
    Thank you for the recommendation :)
ncmncm 6y ago
Hmm, no mention of Alexis Gilliland, "Revolution from Rosinante" and two sequels, ~1980. Recommended. Still current (modulo pocket supercomputers).
mulmen 6y ago
I don’t think the books go into it but here’s an attempt to explain the seasons in A Song of Ice and Fire. https://www.tor.com/2011/05/04/how-seasons-qworkq-in-a-song-of-ice-and-fire/# https://www.tor.com/2011/05/04/how-seasons-qworkq-in-a-song-...

219 points by firebaze 6y ago

coolgod 6y ago

The literature in high impact science journals also makes for great science fiction stories.

b215826 6y ago
Also the most boring ones.
aaronblohowiak 6y ago
can you explain a bit more ?
- ringshall 6y ago
  Nature at least used to publish a single-page science fiction story at the back of every issue. They still publish online, though they've dropped it from the print edition. edit: https://www.nature.com/nature/articles?type=futures https://www.nature.com/nature/articles?type=futures
  - garmaine 6y ago
    While true, I think the grandparent post was making a snarky comment about peer review quality and the replication crisis.

neuromancer2701 6y ago

Alastair Reynolds is just amazing to me. As a side note, I absolutely love the intro The Expanse show because of the all the orbital mechanics.

justinclift 6y ago
> Alastair Reynolds is just amazing to me. His earlier stuff, definitely yes (eg The Inhibitor series). His more recent works (eg Revenger series) is pretty average if not outright bad. I'm on the third book of the Revenger series now, and it's just... crap. :( If you haven't read it yet, avoid it. Major foundation sections of the third books' plot are completely nonsensical, the characters do outright idiotic things to move the plot along, etc. It's not good reading. :(
- jimmygrapes 6y ago
  I think the Revenger series is intended to be more Young Adult level stuff. The Revelation Space series has a lot of good stuff, but also takes pains to not overly explain every tech advance. Diamond Dogs is my all time favorite, even if it's absurd.
- garmaine 6y ago
  Honestly that’s how I felt about Redemption Ark and Absolution Gap too. His writing got bad when he was just tying up loose ends towards the end. Loved Revelation Space, Chasm City, and all the short stories in that universe though. Diamond Dogs is one of my favorite novellas.
7thaccount 6y ago
Revelation Space was amazing as were some of the short stories. I just wish they weren't all so pessemistic. I loved the demarchists and the conjoiners.

TeMPOraL 6y ago

That's a great list, thanks for posting! There's lots of stuff there I haven't read, but want to now. On the same topic, another good resource is the Atomic Rockets Seal of Approval: http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/sealofapproval.php http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/sealofapproval.... - an award given by the Atomic Rockets site for works of fiction that get the physics right.

kaliali 6y ago

How is Three-Body Problem not in here? Otherwise, good list to look at.

teraflop 6y ago
Whatever else you might say about The Three-Body Problem, its physics and astronomy are pretty implausible (the sequels drastically more so).
- maire 6y ago
  I am surprised that Dark Forest is not on the list given they have a whole section on alien life. I now judge all first contact stories against Dark Forest. It does have Gateway on the list which had implausible black holes - so I don't think the plausibility bar is high.
  - mdoms 6y ago
    Yup I would have expected to see Dark Forest because it has such a plausible universe of life and its dynamics, and a believable solution to the Fermi Paradox.
garmaine 6y ago
Its physics and astronomy are laughably bad.

download13 6y ago

Basically anything by Greg Egan is great. His early short stories have a lot of "drugs can let your brain talk to other dimensions" and "your mind literally makes reality" (though some of those are also really good, "The Infinite Assassin" is a great read and it's only like 15 pages), but his later full books are basically all hard (if speculative) physics stuff. Dichronauts is difficult to get your head around, but very rewarding. It's about cartographers who work in a universe with essentially 2.5 dimensions of space and 1.5 dimensions of time. The Orthogonal trilogy is about a species living in a toroidal universe where all 4 dimensions are identical and interchangeable. The universes of Diaspora, Schild's Ladder, and Incandescence are set in a future when most intelligent life in the galaxy lives in a network of space-computers and interact with the outside world via robots and programmable matter. Oh and I almost forgot the Bobiverse series. Not by Egan, but still good. Some guy gets stuck in a brain-computer and sent off in a self-replicating space probe to prepare other planets for human colonization.

jeremyjh 6y ago
Agreed. My favorites are Diaspora, Distress and Permutation City. I like his short stories and I also liked Quarantine which got a mention in this list but its certainly not the only one with with really solid science in it.
Nbox9 6y ago
Bobiverse has lots of _good_ physics, especially around astromechanics, but also lots of questionable, bad, and unexplained physics. Specifically the FTL communications and the clone personality differences exist entirely for plot reasons, have very little explanation, and cause significant amounts of disbelief that must be suspended.
- kbenson 6y ago
  Sure, but I find most interesting science fiction takes liberty at least somewhere. I'm willing to let the author play a little loosely with a few things, which are hopefully explained as "additional input we don't quite understand alter known theories" instead of "ignore this well accepted thing", if it adds significantly to the story. FTL communication? Eh, there's both enough new stuff to discover in physics and it provides such a massive boost to most stories that I'm generally willing to allow it, if treated well. The clone personalities diverging almost immediately? Kinda torn. On the one hand, I think they would diverge significantly eventually anyway (take anyone at age 40 and give them a couple hundred years of experience being a martial protector, trying to unite nations, an R&D head, or a explorer of the wondrous, and you're bound to come out the other side with large differences), so I'm not sure how important it was to have it immediately if the plot points it helped could have been achieved in some other manner.

nineplay 6y ago

From an excellent list, I'm going to hightlight a couple of lesser known works > Sheckley, Robert "Specialist" in Keyes, N., ed. Contact. 1963, Paperback Library. Proposes the idea that life in the universe is all specialized by function, except on Earth. Scheckley's short stories are uniformly excellent. > Clement, Hal Mission of Gravity. 1962, Pyramid. Life on a massive, rapidly rotating planet. Clement is a high-school science teacher. . (A new edition of all his stories about this planet was issued in 2002 by TOR, under the title Heavy Planet.) Fantastic book.

devindotcom 6y ago

Spin by Robert Charles Wilson comes to mind not necessarily because of truly realistic physics or astronomy, but that the physics of the situation are a sort of puzzle that come to make a lot of sense as things progress.

sweetheart 6y ago
This is still my all time favorite Sci Fi book. I just started the sequel last night, and I'm very excited to get sucked back into that world.

AnimalMuppet 6y ago

They got "Redshift Rendezvous"! Great! For those who haven't read it, spaceships create an environment where the speed of light is much slower - the write-up says 30 m/s; my memory is that it's more like 10 m/s, because people were able to sprint moderately close to the speed of light. In this world, you experience relativistic effects just walking around. It does a great job letting you experience what that would be like.

Rebelgecko 6y ago
There's a video game (maybe more of a tech demo?) called A Slower Speed of Light that is set in a universe where the speed of light is just a smidge faster than walking pace. It's fun seeing the redshift and lorentz transformation from a 1st person viewpoint

btilly 6y ago

They only mention Indistinguishable from Magic by Robert L Forward once. But it belongs in a bunch of these categories. Basically what it does is pick a variety of topics of interest to science fiction, has a science fact essay about it, then a short story with theoretically possible technology based on that topic. Highly recommended.

stoneman24 6y ago
Just finished “Camelot 30K” also by Robert L Forward. Humans meet aliens out in the Kuiper belt. Interesting ideas for alien life at very cold temperatures. Similar style to Dragon’s Egg (Mentioned in list) and equally enjoyable.
- garmaine 6y ago
  Absolutely horrible characterization in Camelot 30K. I ended up skipping through the book and skimming past dialogue as it was so bad that it hurt to read. But the idea of the book was utterly fascinating, and I still think about it now and then, years after reading it. Definitely worth reading (or skimming) if you are the type that likes science fiction for the big ideas.

gorkish 6y ago

This list looks amazing. Anyone know of a similar curation for the quantum domain? I’d imagine the list to be ... smaller. /rimshot

philiplu 6y ago

I was expecting to see Arthur C. Clarke's "Fountains of Paradise" (where I first heard about space elevators), but it looks like this isn't aimed at technological ideas, more straight science. Though "telescopes" is one of the categories. Glad to see Poul Anderson's "Tau Zero" on the list - that made a big impression on me when I read it back in the 70s. Fun that Ted Chiang's "Exhalation" shows up in 3 different categories. Stunning story. I would have included his "Tower of Babylon" story as well - in cosmology <g>.

nobody9999 6y ago

Thanks to the poster for submitting this. I'm just now reading the last of the Culture Series[0] by Ian Banks (not included in the list, and for good reason) and will be looking for something new soon. I didn't see Nightfall[1] in the list (although I just skimmed, so it may be there), which (indirectly) addresses orbital dynamics in a system with multiple stars. Perhaps it should be included? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_series https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_series [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightfall_(Asimov_novelette_and_novel) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightfall_(Asimov_novelette_an...

arethuza 6y ago
I've been a Banks fan for a long long time - if you liked the Culture series you might like the Neal Asher Polity series. They aren't quite as well written as Banks - but they do make up for it with a lot of action and some superbly crafted scary beasties (Hooders being particularly terrifying).
- nobody9999 6y ago
  Thanks for the recommendation!

hugocbp 6y ago

Not sure if it is on the same level of realism as those listed for evertyhign, but "The Expanse" series by James S. A. Corey for me was a breath of fresh air. The book really considers things like the time it would take to go from Earth to Mars, or the edge of the Solar System, and also take into account gravity forces in battles and other events. It still has a lot of very sci-fi things in some areas, but it was very interesting to see that going from Earth to somewhere after Neptune really took 8+ months for the passengers, including some of the psychological stress of spending that much time together on a small ship. The TV Series is also good but misses a lot of those little things that the books explicitly deal with. It became my favorite book series because of that. No magically going to another galaxy in the blink of an eye. Going to another planet always required planning, sacrifices, time, etc. In addition it also has some pretty nice politics compared to other space stories.

avaldeso 6y ago
> No magically going to another galaxy in the blink of an eye. Spoiler alert. They do though, kinda. Thousands of systems but all in the Milky Way.
- hugocbp 6y ago
  I tried to keep all examples very, very general not to spoil anything. As a good sci-fi, the books will use some magic here and there, but it is very discrete, in my opinion. Not even close to what most popular space stories do for convenience. I gladly accept that part you are talking about since it came with a very good balance in other areas.
  - eslaught 6y ago
    In my opinion it's better to know that not strictly hard sci-fi. Let me explain, since I think this is an aspect of writing that's not widely appreciated. The beginning of a book essentially sets up "promises" for what the rest of the book is going to be like. In the case of Leviathan Wakes, I think it's entirely reasonable to see the book as making a promise that it's hard sci-fi, given that it's trying so hard to be. All of the little details, like you say, are made very obvious in the beginning. And then, you get a good ways into the book, and suddenly you realize that it's not really hard sci-fi after all. It can be a serious let-down since the book was leading you on to believe it was fully hard sci-fi. Now I'm not actually a huge fan of hard sci-fi per se, but this did irritate me that I didn't bother to pick up any of the sequels. Maybe I'll get back to it some day, since I do think some of the almost-hard details are nice, and now that I know to set the right expectations.

bovermyer 6y ago

David Weber's "Honorverse" series of novels - which starts with On Basilisk Station - has the most believable science fiction "false science" approach I've yet seen in fiction. There's a catch - you have to be OK with long-winded exposition - but the stories are really good, with a fascinating look at technology and culture of a not-too-distant future.

techsupporter 6y ago
> There's a catch - you have to be OK with long-winded exposition Saying Weber has long-winded exposition is a little like saying “Blade Runner” has the occasional sweeping visual. In his later Honorverse novels, especially the most recent, it really feels like our author is getting paid by the word. He has...a lot of story background he feels the need to fill in. If you’ve ever made it to the end of a “Star Trek: The Next Generation” episode and thought “wow, I wonder how that civilization came to be and what happened after our heroes left,” this is the series for you. They’re good stories and I like the middle of the arc in particular but, yes, I hope future readers like very detailed backgrounds on the technology or in-universe history of the societies in question.

mdoms 6y ago

I'd add Neal Stephenson's Seveneves to the Space Travel and perhaps comet sections. There was some excellent physics that dealt with issues like inertia, delta-V, orbital parameters, simulated gravity and complex dynamics (bolos etc) in great detail. As well, it handled long-term day to day life in space as a first class element of the book.

the__alchemist 6y ago
Agree - strongest book I've read in that category. Anathem for the QM section? Maybe a stretch!
- duskwuff 6y ago
  If nothing else, I love the way that Anathem presents an alternate nomenclature for a whole range of scientific and philosophical concepts, ranging from the Hylian Theoric World (Platonic ideals) and Gardan's Steelyard (Occam's Razor) to Saunt Bucker's Basket (Faraday cage). While Stephenson's practice of inventing alternative names met with some derision (like https://xkcd.com/483/ https://xkcd.com/483/), it adds something to the work that wouldn't come through the same way with familiar names.
  - arethuza 6y ago
    "it adds something to the work that wouldn't come through the same way with familiar names" I think it would have been too close to Earth if there hadn't been some sense of "foreignness" created by the different words. Of course, the similarity of Arbre to Earth is an important part of the plot so its not like he could make the environment wildly different.

julienchastang 6y ago

"From the Earth to the Moon" by Jules Verne. The scientific description of how to launch a "rocket" (well, projectile really) and ultimately get stuck in lunar orbit (spoiler) is surprisingly accurate given its publishing date of 1865.

mmaunder 6y ago

This is amazing. Thanks firebaze for posting!!

duskwuff 6y ago

A surprising omission: Blindsight, Peter Watts (2006). A group of transhuman researchers make first contact with an unusual object of extraterrestrial origin. Light on exposition but hard on its science, with extensively researched (and annotated!) details ranging from astrophysics to biology and psychology. Available online: https://rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm https://rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm

m463 6y ago

I have to say... good physics and astronomy... does it lead to a good story? Is it just that some people can't "suspend their belief" without an explainable-in-present-day backdrop? Some of my most fun scifi stories are NOT explainable using current science. just off the top of my head "And He Built a Crooked House" by Heinlein "Little Black Bag" Kornbluth (both findable in one web search) the Gateway series by Pohl or basically anything with time travel or ftl. The thing is - the real world can be BORING. With present-day physics and astronomy - we are alone in the universe with real difficulty escaping our planet, let alone our solar system, galaxy or more. I think the answer to real-world physics and astronomy in science fiction is -- better character development :)

narag 6y ago
I just finished the very nice Anubis Gates by Tim Powers, that mixes time travel with magic.
- JackFr 6y ago
  One of the most well-plotted time travel novels ever. The breadth of Powers’ creativity is a thing of wonder. There were ideas in that book which were just bits of throwaway color, which I still think about years after having read the book. That being said, his other books were a slight let down after Anubis Gates.
  - shadowprofile77 6y ago
    Major agreement with you there, and glad i'm not the only one. After reading the incredibly rich, beautifully rendered world of The Anubis Gates, I expected more of the same from his other books, but no, not quite as good, oddly. That book however remains the single best time travel fantasy novel I've ever read to this day. The blend of nearly phantasmagoric horror, fantasy and a touch of science fiction is unique too. If anyone knows of any similar novels from other authors, i'm all ears.
- m463 6y ago
  Thank you for the recommendation :)

ncmncm 6y ago

Hmm, no mention of Alexis Gilliland, "Revolution from Rosinante" and two sequels, ~1980. Recommended. Still current (modulo pocket supercomputers).

mulmen 6y ago

I don’t think the books go into it but here’s an attempt to explain the seasons in A Song of Ice and Fire. https://www.tor.com/2011/05/04/how-seasons-qworkq-in-a-song-of-ice-and-fire/# https://www.tor.com/2011/05/04/how-seasons-qworkq-in-a-song-...