4 ms·
No idea frate, though I use a wired desktop for the test, so wifi latency isn't a consideration.
by StavrosK 6y ago
No idea frate, though I use a wired desktop for the test, so wifi latency isn't a consideration.
- nottorp 6y agoI have 10 ms to 1.1.1.1 in RO/RDS on wired. I blame their idiotic pppoe.
- spurgu 6y agoI'm getting single digits from Finland: $ ping 1.1.1.1 PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=58 time=3.766 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=4.120 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=4.636 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=3.587 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=5.370 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=3.286 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=4.084 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=3.766 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=3.548 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=6.760 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=58 time=3.667 ms ^C --- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics --- 11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 3.286/4.235/6.760/0.973 ms And this is on wifi.
- heapslip 6y agoI have ~2.2 ms to 1.1.1.1 on RDS, wired as well. I guess it depends on the area and how lucky you are with the equipment they use.
- nottorp 6y agoFrankly 10 ms is good enough.