2 ms·
Actually, according to recent testing by ArsTechinca [0] performance with RAID the topic is more complicated. The testing is focused on ZFS but, quoting from t
by electricant 6y ago
Actually, according to recent testing by ArsTechinca [0] performance with RAID the topic is more complicated.
The testing is focused on ZFS but, quoting from the conclusion:
If you're looking for raw, unbridled performance it's hard to argue against a properly-tuned pool of ZFS mirrors. RAID10 is the fastest per-disk conventional RAID topology in all metrics, and ZFS mirrors beat it resoundingly—sometimes by an order of magnitude—in every category tested, with the sole exception of 4KiB uncached reads.
[0] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/05/zfs-versus-raid-eight-ironwolf-disks-two-filesystems-one-winner/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/05/zfs-versus-raid-eigh...
- oarsinsync 6y ago> it's hard to argue against a properly-tuned pool of ZFS mirrors ... ZFS mirrors beat it resoundingly Emphasis on 'properly-tuned'. This doesn't hold as true as the OP states for the defaults (which is what the majority of home users will be using)
- barrkel 6y agoA pool of mirrored pairs is effectively the ZFS equivalent of RAID10. https://www.klennet.com/notes/2019-08-04-zfs-vs-RAID10.aspx https://www.klennet.com/notes/2019-08-04-zfs-vs-RAID10.aspx