3 ms·
> Speaking from a management perspective... Why would labor protections be needed if the rational move would be to work with the employee to improve their perf
by oh_sigh 6y ago
> Speaking from a management perspective...
Why would labor protections be needed if the rational move would be to work with the employee to improve their performance?
- webmaven 6y ago> > Speaking from a management perspective... > Why would labor protections be needed if the rational move would be to work with the employee to improve their performance? Because management isn't necessarily rational?
- donw 6y agoBecause people are often irrational. Dilbert's pointy-haired boss resonates with a lot of office workers for a reason. We've all had, or at least heard about, that boss who was utterly incompetent, who masked that incompetence in self-important blustering, and who were physically unable to listen to the rank-and-file. Regulation is and should be there to deal with the abusers, and not with the companies that do, in fact, look out for the long-term welfare of both their employees and their customers.
- Consultant32452 6y agoIf only we could fire the pointy haired boss.
- donor20 6y agoIn California you can - non-competes are basically unenforceable, and what you have in your head you can basically use. So you fire them by getting another job.