2 ms·
That would have to include a rule about scope, so that it doesn't end up as two old laws concatenated into one new law ...this would be good for other reasons
by xkcd-sucks 6y ago
That would have to include a rule about scope, so that it doesn't end up as two old laws concatenated into one new law
...this would be good for other reasons too, like unrelated riders tacked onto appropriations bills