> The range of emotions we get from looking at other people's faces is intrinsically worth saving. Citation needed? It's almost-certainly net-enjoyable - but,

> The range of emotions we get from looking at other people's faces is intrinsically worth saving. Citation needed? It's almost-certainly net-enjoyable - but, when you go on to acknowledge that the mere fact of those emotions leads to discrimination against some people, how do you justify this statement other than "those emotions are natural"? To be clear, I am _not_ saying that I would support mandatory calli - forcibly changing someone's neurological responses is an astonishingly dangerous precedent to set; as another commenter points out, that would be terribly dystopian - but I don't think I can agree with your specific statement. Regardless - this sounds like a fascinating story, I'll have a look - thanks!