4 ms·
Kind of tangential, but why is there a concurring opinion here? It seems like it doesn't argue things particularly differently from the majority opinion, and it
by geofft 6y ago
Kind of tangential, but why is there a concurring opinion here? It seems like it doesn't argue things particularly differently from the majority opinion, and it reaches all the same conclusions for (as far as I can tell) all the same reasons.
I assume that my non-lawyer eyes are missing something, so I'm curious what it is.
- filmgirlcw 6y agoIt came to the same conclusion but had a different rationale or might have disagreed with some aspects of the majority opinion. Or perhaps the judge wanted to add something that wasn’t included.