2 ms·
I feel like whatever is happening here is more subtle than being "hellbent on disenfranchising high-achieving Asians". I think it's probably still in the catego
by ajkjk 6y ago
I feel like whatever is happening here is more subtle than being "hellbent on disenfranchising high-achieving Asians". I think it's probably still in the category of 'racist', but works via a more complicated mechanism.
I can kinda imagine: it is ingrained in people's minds that a 'proper' institution ought to be mostly white, with some small percentages of each minority, and if things aren't working out that way the institution seems 'wrong' and becomes up for re-organization. The mindset is explicitly racist and is some sort of modern rendition of colonialism: that this country is still white society, foremost, and everyone else is here with white approval. But it's probably not that the individual bureaucrats (or whoever is in charge of this) is consciously bigoted -- it's that it's baked into society in a way that they can't see beyond.
This is an off-the-cuff unqualified theory. Would love to know if anyone with more familiarity of the situation has a more reality-based model.
- clownworld789 6y agoThe U.S. has been a White super-majority country for centuries, and is still a White majority country. Is it 100% [racism/colonialism(what?)/biogtry] for people to believe that institutions follow the demographics of the communities that they exist in? As the demographics of the country change (less and less White), so will the institutions. The school in question is 19% White. 75% Asian. Fairfax County is 63% White, 18% Asian. Sure. It's all racism.