>>Isn't that the whole point of most "safe AGI" research IDK, honestly. Not my lane. At an uneducated guess, I would say that it's probably a more common topic

>>Isn't that the whole point of most "safe AGI" research IDK, honestly. Not my lane. At an uneducated guess, I would say that it's probably a more common topic of "safe AGI" press articles than actual research. Dunno though. It's too theoretical. When technology is theoretical, we tend to personify it. If we imagined an automated hotel in the 60s, we'd probably imagine a humanoid robot standing at reception. In the 2000s, that image would have been a screen at reception. Today, it's an app that also unlocks the door and there is no lobby. My guess is that by the time AI can be programmed via abstract ethics, it will have upended so much that its just hard to reason about from our current position. I hope "AI ethics" are focused on stuff that's applicable now.