Definitely. This was the deal breaker for people. Why buy a more expensive device that can do less? To keep it competitive it should have been priced low, an

Definitely. This was the deal breaker for people. Why buy a more expensive device that can do less? To keep it competitive it should have been priced low, and digital versions should have been competitively priced. Plus, sim-shipping the disc and the PSN version should have been done for every single title. These are the same decisions that are killing Microsoft's 360 Games on Demand service. Delays to the service and uncompetitive prices just make the service useless. I sort of wonder if there are B&M agreements that are causing this sort of behaviour. Otherwise it just doesn't make sense.