As said, and said agian, I mention videos of abuse (not abuse itself). I will not tell you this again if you still dot get that. > To argue that child pornogra

As said, and said agian, I mention videos of abuse (not abuse itself). I will not tell you this again if you still dot get that. > To argue that child pornography is a form of speech is rather ridiculous To lawyers it is not. Again this is about the video, not the act itself. You repeatedly dont get that difference. > but there are limits on forms of expression. I cannot choose to stab people as a form of free expression, nor torch a building. Great! you get it! We cannot allow all expression. Now on stabbing we agree. On abuse videos as well. But on inciting hate/violence we dont. May I ask why you want to defend inciting hate/violence -speech?