4 ms·
That is more nepotism, and it is not necessary bad. People work better with people they know and trust. Nepotism can lead to nefarious amongst a group with peo
by 0df8dkdf 6y ago
That is more nepotism, and it is not necessary bad. People work better with people they know and trust.
Nepotism can lead to nefarious amongst a group with people who has a lot of power and money. That is probably what happened in US with Bushes, Clintons and Obamas.
At this point, even mainstream pretty much admitted that use is an oligarchy: https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
- TeMPOraL 6y agoWhat I wrote does not necessitate nepotism. It doesn't have to be that those already in power actively select for their friends and relatives to join their rank. Just that if most people who become rich and powerful tend to go through a small subset of universities or networks, they all end up having a similar mindset.