3 ms·
> There’s a pretty good reason, actually, and it’s exactly npm. You mean whoever created NPM the business profited from Node JS barebone standard library, whic
by throw_m239339 6y ago
> There’s a pretty good reason, actually, and it’s exactly npm.
You mean whoever created NPM the business profited from Node JS barebone standard library, which Node JS creator himself regretted creating an opportunity for a commercial package manager and registry by making his creating depend on such commercial product.
- dcgudeman 6y agoProfited? I thought NPM had to be acquired because they couldn’t figure out a sustainable business model.
- throw_m239339 6y ago> Profited? I thought NPM had to be acquired because they couldn’t figure out a sustainable business model. Since when acquisitions are free for the buyer? Someobody made a lot of money from NPM.