3 ms·
"It's a complex problem so we just cast everything to a sting and require applications to handle the typing" is what I interpret it as. Honestly after a few ye
by geerlingguy 6y ago
"It's a complex problem so we just cast everything to a sting and require applications to handle the typing" is what I interpret it as.
Honestly after a few years using YAML you remember to always quote anything you know you need to be a string, and the different multi line types.
An argument against this is "why not just design it to be simpler" — well, then it's less useful in as wide a variety of applications, and stands less chance of actually becoming a standard like JSON or YAML has. And you end up with the XKCD problem.
YAML came in and solved a few of JSON's most glaring problems (multi line and comments) with a usable approach.
This new format seems like it's "YAML, but a little different."
If I wanted to usurp YAML, I'd focus on the greatest pain points for most, whitespace and schema support.
- robocat 6y ago> YAML came in and solved a few of JSON's most glaring problems AFAIK they were both independently created in 2001 and YAML was not created in response to JSON.
- jeffnappi 6y agoSadly my comment will not add value to the conversation, but I came to the comments looking to see if someone made the XKCD reference. To my delight, here you are. #927 always delivers - https://xkcd.com/927/ https://xkcd.com/927/
- timc3 6y agoYAML just introduced other problems.