3 ms·
> and when something is missing, it is not part of the contract. What if a clause is ambiguous to benefit both parties equally, but not at the same time? Are b
by anticensor 6y ago
> and when something is missing, it is not part of the contract.
What if a clause is ambiguous to benefit both parties equally, but not at the same time? Are both parties forbidden to act on their own in those cases?
- Rochus 6y agoThere is no general answer. The judge decides and instructs the parties how to proceed. Contracts in Anglo-Saxon countries are usually much larger and regulate many more eventualities than one is used to in Europe. It is then usually a matter of presenting evidence in the sense of the specific wording of the contract.