4 ms·
If they fix themselves after the first fine, killing them would’ve been worse. That’s why it isn’t supposed to do that. For the repeat offenders, they can be fi
by colejohnson66 6y ago
If they fix themselves after the first fine, killing them would’ve been worse. That’s why it isn’t supposed to do that. For the repeat offenders, they can be fined up to 4% of the profit. If that 4% still doesn’t fix you up, you’ll be fined again and again until you either fix yourself or are killed. So it’s working as intended.
- black_puppydog 6y agoActually it could be 4% of the revenue IIRC. And that can definitely company-ending. Of course that should be an endgame.
- a_imho 6y agoGoogle recently introduced yet another opt-out nagbox. It shows up for example on search and youtube. Non compliant. Repeat offender. What should be the right course of action? As far as I'm aware GDPR was not supposed to be another Cookie Law, it is not working as intended.