> 3. It's hard to compete against MS VS code. I agree, but as an emacs user that has tried it multiple times, I really don't "get it". The main thing that exc

> 3. It's hard to compete against MS VS code. I agree, but as an emacs user that has tried it multiple times, I really don't "get it". The main thing that excited me about Xi wasn't Xi itself, but rather that its technology stack could be user to "build your own editor" using a solid foundation. That includes a more modern emacs, vi, vs code, or whatever you like.