3 ms·

But that's only if they own/operate the venue. And there is commercial separation between the ticketing service and venue. So it's like you use Google Firebase

But that's only if they own/operate the venue. And there is commercial separation between the ticketing service and venue. So it's like you use Google Firebase as the backend for your app and they take a cut under that agreement, as opposed to the Play Store agreement.

parasubvert 6y ago
Ticketmaster often negotiates exclusivity rights to venues. Meaning you can’t use a different ticket selling service for that venue. There was an attempt to argue they were a monopoly that should be regulated due to the % of the ticket they retained (Pearl Jam spearheaded this in the 90s). It didn’t work. Also I see nothing wrong as a business model with the Firebase analogy. If you could convince customers to go for it, then why not? Will the business model police arrest you? What I don’t get about these arguments is that they’re trying to get the government to punish a couple of companies that built a very successful business model purely because others want some of that dough. This isn’t about monopoly by any historical definition, it’s about sour grapes.