5 ms·
Unless something changed lately, this is a little deceiving. If you check your own account, it finds albums and can even download some shared photos. If you c
by mumblerino 6y ago
Unless something changed lately, this is a little deceiving.
If you check your own account, it finds albums and can even download some shared photos.
If you check the same account but using another account's cookies… surprise surprise, "No album" appears.
# Own account
Name: ---public name----
Last profile edit : 2019/12/01
Email : ----------@gmail.com
Google ID : ------id------
Hangouts Bot : No
Activated Google services :
- Photos
- Maps
Google Photos : https://get.google.com/albumarchive/------id------
=> 4 albums, 50 photos
Searching metadata...
[+] 1 device found !
- Apple iPhone 7 (40 pics) [2017/01/1]
-> 1 Firmware found !
--> 10.3.0 [2017/01/1]
Google Maps : https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/------id------/reviews
=> 167 reviews found !
Probable location (confidence => Okay) :
- --------, ----------
# Other account
Name: ---public name----
Last profile edit : 2019/12/01
Email : ----------@gmail.com
Google ID : ------id------
Hangouts Bot : No
Activated Google services :
- Photos
- Maps
Google Photos : https://get.google.com/albumarchive/------id------
=> No album
Google Maps : https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/------id------/reviews
=> No reviews
- strombofulous 6y agoFrom the readme: > 02/10/2020 : Since few days ago, Google return a 404 when we try to access someone's Google Photos public albums, we can only access it if we have a link of one of his albums. Either this is a bug and this will be fixed, either it's a protection that we need to find how to bypass. So, currently, the photos & metadata module will always return "No albums" even if there is one.
- koheripbal 6y agoI hate these date formats. I wish folks would use the iso standard YYYY-MM-DD
- Pyramus 6y agoAgreed. However YYYY-MM-DD is symmetric to DD-MM-YYYY ...
- z3ncyberpunk 6y agoDash positions say otherwise
- mumblerino 6y agoHow convenient that this repo was published just a day too late. Now it’s just advertising something that it doesn’t do, either because it never did or because Google fixed it. I think it’s the former.