4 ms·
Agreed on the first part, unfortunately most functional languages are difficult for most developers (read: non-academics or HN readers) to grasp. As somebody wh
by olegp 16y ago
Agreed on the first part, unfortunately most functional languages are difficult for most developers (read: non-academics or HN readers) to grasp. As somebody who taught me ML said: "if it's difficult to write, it should be difficult to read". Perhaps this will change, but it will be a while before we have a functional language that's as mainstream as JavaScript.
Most big websites have asynchronous components to address their performance bottlenecks, but the bulk of the business logic uses synchronous I/O and unfashionable languages like PHP as per the 90/10 law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_optimization#Bottlenecks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_optimization#Bottleneck...
- sausagefeet 16y agoBrings me back to my original comment: > Erlang, Haskell, Mozart/Oz all do it superior to something like Node, people just haven't realized it yet so a language that people want to use can be built. Someday....someday...