5 ms·
The starting point is that scanning a book and making it available to somebody else involves copying the book, and therefore infringes copyright unless you have
by sjy 6y ago
The starting point is that scanning a book and making it available to somebody else involves copying the book, and therefore infringes copyright unless you have the copyright holder’s permission or a fair use justification. In contrast, lending a physical book does not result in a copy being created. The e-lending system you have proposed is essentially what the Internet Archive calls “controlled digital lending.” The publishers say it is copyright infringement [1]; the Internet Archive says it is analogous to traditional library lending and falls under fair use [2]. The case hasn’t gone to trial yet.
[1] https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.537900/gov.uscourts.nysd.537900.1.0.pdf https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.537900...
[2] https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.537900/gov.uscourts.nysd.537900.33.0.pdf https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.537900...
- haltingproblem 6y agoThank You for the links. Does what Google books have done and their work with Haathi Trust (https://www.hathitrust.org/ https://www.hathitrust.org/) fall in the same category? I thought this was tested in courts with respect to books. There is analogous case law backing up music CDs, won't that hold?