I feel like that's kind of a manager-conversation thing, plus, like many policies, will depend on the workplace culture to begin with. IMHO the tricky bit is t

I feel like that's kind of a manager-conversation thing, plus, like many policies, will depend on the workplace culture to begin with. IMHO the tricky bit is that, there is both an honest and genuine way to express concern around using "precisely the right language", so to speak, and, a malicious, not-an-honest-partner-in-the-conversation, gum-up-the-works way. And also, I guess a "this-is-all-unpleasant-and-I-just-don't-want-to-think-about-it-or-think-about-the-historical-context-for-why-we-are-talking-about-this-in-the-first-place-I-have-enough-on-my-plate-as-it-is" kind of way. Of course there is also virtue signaling or what have you; that's a thing. Human foolishness has no bias. Obviously HN is not the right place for discussing specifics, but, IMHO, that's maybe the only way to have a real conversation around this stuff. Which takes trust and a shared safe space. Which can be hard to come by these days. That said, IMHO my patience decreases a bit, sadly, every day when I read the news. There's a context to all this, after all. And a very real history.