4 ms·
My post was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, and was kind of a lighthearted commentary on DRM and the state of content. Nonetheless, your argument (correct me if I'm
by mirkules 16y ago
My post was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, and was kind of a lighthearted commentary on DRM and the state of content.
Nonetheless, your argument (correct me if I'm wrong) is essentially that The Internet will automagically preserve all content, the way to decode it and reproduce it in the way it was originally intended to be consumed - forever.
The implication in my post was that the internet won't last forever, that civilizations come and go, and maybe with the end of our civilization the internet will be lost, and with it the key to decoding all this information. I understand that the devices themselves will or already have the capability to preserve the data forever (for all practical purposes), but this is akin to being on a deserted island and saying you have 8 million songs on your iPod, but no earphones to play them with. On top of that, imagine that you go through all the trouble of figuring out how to make earphones from raw materials you find on this island, figuring out how the plug is supposed to work, how to charge the battery - only to find out that the songs are all crap.
- erikpukinskis 16y agothe internet won't last forever, that civilizations come and go, and maybe with the end of our civilization the internet will be lost I actually think the internet is a kind of permaculture. It's like a new kingdom. We have animal kingdom, the plant kingdom, the bacteria, fungi, etc, and now the bit kingdom. And it's as robust as the other kingdoms. I doubt you could come up with any kind of vaguely plausible scenario where the internet disappeared completely.