Unless something has changed, he is in the camp of people like t' Hooft that claim QM is really an approximation to underlying classical/deterministic/superdete

Unless something has changed, he is in the camp of people like t' Hooft that claim QM is really an approximation to underlying classical/deterministic/superdeterminism. And while that is possible, the trade-offs are usually far worse or harder to explain than the baggage QM brings. Or just based on an incorrect understanding of QM Here is one breakdown: https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0206089.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0206089.pdf