3 ms·
Wait a second. Correct me if I am wrong but does he write that he has a theory of spacetime from that both quantum mechanics and relativity can be derived? Woul
by choeger 6y ago
Wait a second. Correct me if I am wrong but does he write that he has a theory of spacetime from that both quantum mechanics and relativity can be derived? Would that not be a slam dunk Nobel prize?
- tmabraham 6y agoThat's not how this works. Anybody can come up with some random theory, but if it doesn't have testable predictions that can validate the theory, then it doesn't mean we solved quantum gravity. This is the case with Wolfram.
- meroes 6y agoUnless something has changed, he is in the camp of people like t' Hooft that claim QM is really an approximation to underlying classical/deterministic/superdeterminism. And while that is possible, the trade-offs are usually far worse or harder to explain than the baggage QM brings. Or just based on an incorrect understanding of QM Here is one breakdown: https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0206089.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0206089.pdf
- beervirus 6y agoHe's a crank.