I'm not suggesting they shouldn't be. On the contrary, "on top of" is fine; those efforts cost money and time. I'm saying that some people don't care about comp

I'm not suggesting they shouldn't be. On the contrary, "on top of" is fine; those efforts cost money and time. I'm saying that some people don't care about compliance, and are just out to get monetary "damages". Which is exceptionally questionable when you're just one of the tens of thousands of people who might theoretically have a claim, but you're pursuing something unilaterally without regard for actually obtaining sources and encouraging future compliance.