5 ms·
> And it lumps them in with those who are likely still in school I won't argue that one, but where do you draw the line with > have no real job yet I would
by Shared404 6y ago
> And it lumps them in with those who are likely still in school
I won't argue that one, but where do you draw the line with
> have no real job yet
I would argue that as long as you are working, you have a real job.
Probably the best would be to track both 25-30 and 18-30 and see how it changes.
- throwaway0a5e 6y ago>I would argue that as long as you are working, you have a real job. If you're working nights in a warehouse while you finish your degree that will get you into an industry with nearly six figure starting salaries then I would argue that you're not "working yet" you're just a student with income.
- Shared404 6y agoWhat does salary have to do if somethings a "real job"? Or what about blue collar workers who aren't going to school, and are at that same warehouse? Are they not working at a real job?
- throwaway0a5e 6y agoSalary has nothing to do with it. Finishing one's education for the foreseeable future has everything to do with it.
- Shared404 6y agoI've thought about this for a while now, and for the purposes of this discussion I agree. That being the case, I think that the study would be best off tracking those 18-30 who are living individually and are not attending school. Thoughts?
- throwaway0a5e 6y agoYeah that would be ideal but that's much harder for the people doing the study than just picking an age.