4 ms·

I'm absolutely not suggesting you rely on a third party. It's very easy and preferable to pass around source code, and it's (by design) very easy to build GNU/L

by swiley 6y ago

I'm absolutely not suggesting you rely on a third party. It's very easy and preferable to pass around source code, and it's (by design) very easy to build GNU/Linux apps from the source. Distributing binaries will absolutely bring about calls to lock computing down to 3rd party distributors because the kind of people that can't handle typing `./configure` are the same kind that will pull random maleware off of google. No good can come from installing closed software anyway.

AnIdiotOnTheNet 6y ago
> I'm absolutely not suggesting you rely on a third party. It's very easy and preferable to pass around source code, and it's (by design) very easy to build GNU/Linux apps from the source. Yeah, it is so easy that no one ever uses containers to ensure a consistent and working build environment for software! Oh wait, yes they do.
- swiley 6y ago
  If your application is that complex then yes you probably should be working with it in a container. There are decades of very good desktop applications that are simple and easy to build. Flatpack will just encourage things like slack.