2 ms·
I don't really understand if you are surprised by that or not. That is the expected behaviour of regular let. Parallel binding. let* is sequential.
by bjoli 6y ago
I don't really understand if you are surprised by that or not. That is the expected behaviour of regular let. Parallel binding. let* is sequential.
- _emacsomancer_ 6y agoI'm not surprised by that. The parent suggested (or I thought that they did) that this was actually the definition for let* . And my point was to show that it does not behave like let* but rather like plain let.