4 ms·
> Changing the date without changing the code significantly is arguably fraudulent. In some countries the publishing date is what counts, and they define publi
by noja 6y ago
> Changing the date without changing the code significantly is arguably fraudulent.
In some countries the publishing date is what counts, and they define publishing for websites as when the site was viewed.
- Zarel 6y agoPresumably, even if publishing date is relevant, it's only first publication that's relevant. No work should stay copyrighted forever just because it's constantly being republished.
- noja 6y ago> it's only first publication that's relevant. No, the publishing date is relevant (not the first publishing date).