4 ms·

The definition of systemic racism, as a theory, is that a country (specifically the US) was founded as a racist country (black people were the property of white

The definition of systemic racism, as a theory, is that a country (specifically the US) was founded as a racist country (black people were the property of white people). This is not so in Poland, therefore it can't be considered systemic racism.

lucideer 6y ago
Do you have citations for this? My own experience of the term's usage is to simply imply that racism is part of a system's inherent structural definition, rather than being purely reliant on individual/group biases. In particular in Europe, one very simplistic example of this is the systemic intolerance of nomadic peoples. This is not limited to individuals discriminating against nomadic people, but rather that legislation and bureaucratic processes are in place that give inherent preference to those who are not nomadic; most obviously in laws related to property rentals and ownership, but also pervading every form of corporate and public administration.
- StavrosK 6y ago
  Sure: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0415952786 https://www.amazon.com/dp/0415952786 https://www.thoughtco.com/systemic-racism-3026565 https://www.thoughtco.com/systemic-racism-3026565 > My own experience of the term's usage is to simply imply that racism is part of a system's inherent structural definition, rather than being purely reliant on individual/group biases. By that definition, all racism is systemic racism, since the system is made up of people.
  - lucideer 6y ago
    I haven't read any of Feagin's research, but from reading that article's commentary on Feagin's research, it outlines a highly US-centric approach to defining systemic racism, which would imply that systemic racism, by definition, cannot exist outside of the US. I don't know enough in the field to know if Feagin's definition is a popular one worldwide, or even within the US, but it seems somewhat reductive on first reading. If systemic racism cannot occur outside of the US, what then should we refer to racism that is "systemic" as? > By that definition, all racism is systemic racism, since the system is made up of people. Technically, I would agree, but going that far seems somewhat pedantic.
    - StavrosK 6y ago
      Well, Feagin defined systemic racism, as a concept it's US-specific. > If systemic racism cannot occur outside of the US, what then should we refer to racism that is "systemic" as? I don't know, I sincerely don't understand your definition. How can a country be comprised of racist people but have a system that isn't, or vice versa?

lucideer 6y ago

Do you have citations for this? My own experience of the term's usage is to simply imply that racism is part of a system's inherent structural definition, rather than being purely reliant on individual/group biases. In particular in Europe, one very simplistic example of this is the systemic intolerance of nomadic peoples. This is not limited to individuals discriminating against nomadic people, but rather that legislation and bureaucratic processes are in place that give inherent preference to those who are not nomadic; most obviously in laws related to property rentals and ownership, but also pervading every form of corporate and public administration.

StavrosK 6y ago
Sure: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0415952786 https://www.amazon.com/dp/0415952786 https://www.thoughtco.com/systemic-racism-3026565 https://www.thoughtco.com/systemic-racism-3026565 > My own experience of the term's usage is to simply imply that racism is part of a system's inherent structural definition, rather than being purely reliant on individual/group biases. By that definition, all racism is systemic racism, since the system is made up of people.
- lucideer 6y ago
  I haven't read any of Feagin's research, but from reading that article's commentary on Feagin's research, it outlines a highly US-centric approach to defining systemic racism, which would imply that systemic racism, by definition, cannot exist outside of the US. I don't know enough in the field to know if Feagin's definition is a popular one worldwide, or even within the US, but it seems somewhat reductive on first reading. If systemic racism cannot occur outside of the US, what then should we refer to racism that is "systemic" as? > By that definition, all racism is systemic racism, since the system is made up of people. Technically, I would agree, but going that far seems somewhat pedantic.
  - StavrosK 6y ago
    Well, Feagin defined systemic racism, as a concept it's US-specific. > If systemic racism cannot occur outside of the US, what then should we refer to racism that is "systemic" as? I don't know, I sincerely don't understand your definition. How can a country be comprised of racist people but have a system that isn't, or vice versa?