4 ms·
Ok, so climate change is an existential threat. So why instead of talking about how we should stop reproducing and live frugally- which we all know it's not goi
by Udik 6y ago
Ok, so climate change is an existential threat. So why instead of talking about how we should stop reproducing and live frugally- which we all know it's not going to happen- we don't replace 100% of our non-renewable power generation with nuclear? Because it is expensive? But who cares? Or because it is dangerous? But again, 100 Chernobyls are better than complete destruction, right? So where are the climate activists' rallies for nuclear power?
- LatteLazy 6y agoBecause you need every nation to do it and they won't. Because it would be way too expensive and you could get the same result much cheaper and quicker other ways. Because even if we did this, it would be less than 20% of what we need to do.