3 ms·
Thunderbird. Yes, the e-mail client. Adding a new feed is neither user friendly, nor obvious, but it's nice to not need an extra program to read feeds.
by rudolfwinestock 6y ago
Thunderbird. Yes, the e-mail client.
Adding a new feed is neither user friendly, nor obvious, but it's nice to not need an extra program to read feeds.
- TacoSteemers 6y agoI also use Thunderbird for both RSS and email. It is perfectly acceptable to me that neither functionality is easy to work with, because in return I get all my non-instant messaging in just one application. I'd probably really like it if it was possible to interact with WhatsApp and possibly Slack inside Thunderbird as well.
- nunodonato 6y ago+1 for thunderbird. I personally dont feel the need for an extra app to read feeds when thunderbird already does it quite well.
- stinos 6y agoneither user friendly, nor obvious, but it's nice ... The summary of Thunderbird basically.. It has like all the features imaginable, and the core ones are done ok-ish, but after years of using it I still feel like throwing it out every now and then because of all the weirdness and quirks and straight-up bugs.
- bArray 6y ago> Adding a new feed is neither user friendly, nor obvious, > but it's nice to not need an extra program to read feeds. Agreed. It's also nice to have the ability to search everything, I sometimes forget where I read something. One thing I wish it could do is take a standard web page (HTML) and allow me to build a feed out of it. Or at the least keep any eye on the page and tell me when it changes.