4 ms·
Why would a single person like moderator allows to choose what I can hear or not? Muting should be my choice not someone determining what I can hear or not? The
by ikerdanzel 6y ago
Why would a single person like moderator allows to choose what I can hear or not? Muting should be my choice not someone determining what I can hear or not? The debate was not even between candidate. It was the worst presidential debate moderation ever. It looks as if Chris is running as Democratic candidate.
- foogazi 6y agoI thought it was because the rules allowed for interruption free segments Wallace called that out - those segments were not for back and forth Also if someone is answering a question why would the other candidate start talking?
- krapp 6y ago>Also if someone is answering a question why would the other candidate start talking? Because many Americans want to see displays of defiance and aggression in their political candidates. Most couldn't care less about what the other party has to say, they want to see their side dominate and smack down the other side, or they want to see who the alpha dog is and vote for them.
- jimmydddd 6y agoChris Wallace (the moderator of the debate earlier this week) actually made that point this morning. He said that he would not feel comfortable as a moderator deciding to cut off what a candidate was saying. He advised against muting by the moderator.
- basch 6y agoThe speaker could mute the other person while they are talking, so they can focus. I dont care if the injector, babbling away, still gets to broadcast their rant, but people should have the option to only listen to the "designated speaker" audio track, and the person speaking should be free from interjection if that is the rules agreed upon.