3 ms·
My experience has been the reverse. I've found MobX code easier to maintain than equivalent Redux code, and although it's obviously subjective, I feel it is a g
by Lazare 6y ago
My experience has been the reverse. I've found MobX code easier to maintain than equivalent Redux code, and although it's obviously subjective, I feel it is a good fit for the React model.
Just noting that experiences may differ sharply. :)
- chrisweekly 6y agoSame. I found MobX to be easier to reason about than Redux. I'd really like to give MST (mobx-state-tree) a closer look, too. MWeststrate is a "gentle giant" of sorts, and the idea of leveraging his more-opinionated framework resonates.
- Lazare 6y agoI've used MST on a project and it was everything I'd hoped. Obviously one project isn't a lot of data, but I'd certainly use it again if another opportunity arose.
- pknopf 6y agoIt doesn't sound like the MobX author has any attention on supporting MST.
- Epskampie 6y agoI’ve tried to use MST, but found it quite hard and contrived to use. I’m sticking with regular mobx for now, which I absolutely love. Since MST seems to be looking for maintainers I’m inclined to think it’s the best choice. If you really need the (complex) functionality of MST, redux might be a safer choice going forward in that case.