> Those protections still don't prevent platforms from doing half the things conservatives complain about. I never made any comment about what the law is. Ins

> Those protections still don't prevent platforms from doing half the things conservatives complain about. I never made any comment about what the law is. Instead I only made comments about what should be. Those protection will prevent many more things if those protections are changed. Literally the purpose of these senate subpoenas is to re-evaluate these laws. > Section 230 doesn't actually require platforms They will require more things if they get changed to do so, which is the entire point of all this discussion, lol. Thats the point of all of this. To re-evaluate what these protections should be, and to engage in legislative action.